iX xDrive40 vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4953 mm
4922 mm
1967 mm
2004 mm
1695 mm
1745 mm
3000 mm
2975 mm
500 L
645 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.5 Km/L
/
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
326 BHP - 619 BHP
306 BHP - 530 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
3.0 L - 5.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
326 BHP
530 BHP
630 Nm
750 Nm
/
4.4 L
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
X5 M50i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX5 M50i xDrive
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about interior space; choose X5 M50i xDrive if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data, while X5 M50i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while X5 M50i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iX xDrive40, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive, while X5 M50i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.