CarteaCompare CarsJAC J6 2016 1.8 vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

JAC J6 2016 1.8 vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

175

/

4

/

/

3.5 Liter

Dimensions

7 Seater

8

4550

5155

1775

1995

1660

1740

2710

/

430

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

11.9

/

55

72

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

4.2

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

7

Infotainment

/

/

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

8 Speed AT

/

8 Speed AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

Key Spec

1.8 L

3.3 L - 3.5 L

105 BHP

245 - 290

Automatic

8 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT w/E-SHIFT (SWB) & Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

7 - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.8 L

3.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

268 BHP

165

/

/

3.5 Liters, 3,470 cc, 6 Cylinders, 24 VALVE, DOHC

/

6

/

268 hp / 6,400 rpm

/

33.8 Kg.m (331.5 Nm) /5,000 rpm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • JAC J6 2016 1.8

    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
  • Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious space and comfort in interior design
  • Advanced and reliable security features
  • Stylish design and high-quality materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • Control and driving are not accurate
  • The user interface for some features is complicated

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJAC J6 2016 1.8

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose JAC J6 2016 1.8 if you care more about price; choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

VS

Li Auto | Mega 2024 Ultra

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

VS

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

VS

JAC | JAC J6 2015 1.8

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

VS

Toyota | Toyota Sienna L

JAC | JAC J6 2016 1.8

VS

Toyota | Toyota Sienna SE

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, JAC J6 2016 1.8 has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, JAC J6 2016 1.8 has a wheelbase of 2710, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. JAC J6 2016 1.8 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data.