JAC J6 2016 1.8 vs D9 DM-i Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
4550
5,250
1775
1,960
1660
1,920
2710
3,110
430
/
Fuel Economy
11.9
16.1 km/L
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
E-CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
105 BHP
296 - 369
Automatic
E-CVT & Single-speed Fixed Gear
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.8 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
105 BHP
296
165
681
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
JAC J6 2016 1.8
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
D9 DM-i
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJAC J6 2016 1.8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose JAC J6 2016 1.8 if you care more about price; choose D9 DM-i if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, JAC J6 2016 1.8 has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while D9 DM-i has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, D9 DM-i is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, JAC J6 2016 1.8 has a wheelbase of 2710, while D9 DM-i has a wheelbase of 3,110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, D9 DM-i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. JAC J6 2016 1.8 uses Front Wheel Drive, while D9 DM-i uses No data.