Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
183
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4448
4700
1512
1865
1718
1710
2635
2710
643
/
Fuel Economy
9.9
/
51
58
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
12
/
8
/
SONY
Transmission
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
225/55 R19
/
225/55 R19
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.0 L
172 BHP - 180 BHP
229 BHP - 233 BHP
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
233 BHP
220
390
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Economy
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
CS75 PLUS SPORT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High off-road driving ability
- Advanced security features
Negative
- Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
- Luggage space is limited
- Medium performance acceleration capability
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L if you care more about price; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2635, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS75 PLUS SPORT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L uses All Wheel Drive, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.