Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
/
10.9
/
✓
Engine / Motor
183
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4448
4.314
1512
1.809
1718
1.624
2635
2.585
643
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
9.9
17.2
51
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
172 BHP - 180 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
172 BHP
112 BHP
220
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High off-road driving ability
- Advanced security features
Negative
- Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
- Luggage space is limited
- Medium performance acceleration capability
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2635, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Compass 2016 Limited 2.4L uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.