Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

183

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4448

/

1512

/

1718

/

2635

/

643

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

9.9

/

51

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

14.5

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.4 L

/

172 BHP - 180 BHP

TBD

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

172 BHP

/

220

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Rollover stability control
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive and modern exterior design
  • High off-road driving ability
  • Advanced security features

Negative

  • Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
  • Luggage space is limited
  • Medium performance acceleration capability

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2635, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.