Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
183
200 km/h
4
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4448
4780 mm
1512
1885 mm
1718
1730 mm
2635
2800 mm
643
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
9.9
16 Km/L
51
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
172 BHP - 180 BHP
197 BHP - 261 BHP
Automatic
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
290 BHP
220
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High off-road driving ability
- Advanced security features
Negative
- Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
- Luggage space is limited
- Medium performance acceleration capability
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L if you care more about price; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, TXL Comfort 1.6T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2635, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, TXL Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Compass 2016 Sport 2.4L uses All Wheel Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.