Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude vs Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180
6
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
✓
/
4.828
4237
1.943
1875
1.792
1869
2.916
2459
782
898
Fuel Economy
10.0
9.1
93
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
2.0 L - 3.6 L
286 BHP - 707 BHP
270 BHP - 285 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
3.6 L
Petrol
Gasoline
290 BHP
285 BHP
350
353
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Related comparisons
Editor's PickWrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude if you care more about fuel economy; choose Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude has a fuel consumption of 10, while Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude has a wheelbase of 2.916, while Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X has a wheelbase of 2459. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Wrangler 3.6L V6 Rubicon X uses All Wheel Drive.