Jidu 01 Performance vs 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV Comparison

Car Information

3.8

/

Engine / Motor

200

200 km/h

N/A, Electric

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4853

4760 mm

1990

1930 mm

1611

1927 mm

3000

2750 mm

2161

400 L

/

5 Doors

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

/

15 Km/L

/

75 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

268 - 536

342 BHP

AT

Automatic

Electric

Hybrid

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.0 L

Electric

Hybrid

536

342 BHP

726

648 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Motor

Dual Motor

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Jidu 01 Performance

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Jidu 01 Performance if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jidu | Jidu 01 Performance

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Jidu | Jidu 01 Performance

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Jidu | Jidu 01 Performance

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Jidu | Jidu 01 Performance

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Jidu | Jidu 01 Performance

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Jidu 01 Performance has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Jidu 01 Performance has a wheelbase of 3000, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Jidu 01 Performance, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jidu 01 Performance uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.