K900 3.8L GDI V6 vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
193 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5120 mm
4659 mm
1915 mm
1778 mm
1490 mm
1482 mm
3103 mm
2651 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
8.5 Km/L
14.1 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
14.1 Km/L
/
55 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
3.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
315 BHP
115 BHP
400 Nm
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
115 BHP - 158
/
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
K900 3.8L GDI V6
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose K900 3.8L GDI V6 if you care more about interior space; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, K900 3.8L GDI V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Jetta 2.0 S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, K900 3.8L GDI V6 has a wheelbase of 3103 mm, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, K900 3.8L GDI V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. K900 3.8L GDI V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.