X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.400
4949 mm
1.831
1930 mm
1.653
1790 mm
2.632
2810 mm
450
/
Fuel Economy
51
74 L
/
10.5 Km/L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9- SPEED CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
156 BHP
233 BHP
CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
156 BHP
233 BHP
230
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury if you care more about overall equipment; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury has a wheelbase of 2.632, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X3 Pro 1.5T Luxury uses Front Wheel Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.