Cerato 1.6L EX vs 1.6 Turbo Hybrid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
/
/
1,598
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4640
5050
1800
1880
1440
1480
2700
2895
427
/
/
1624
/
1631
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
53
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
/
MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension
/
MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 3.5 L
122 BHP - 161 BHP
177 BHP - 300 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.6
Gasoline
Hybrid
128 BHP
177
154
264
/
47.7
/
177
/
4500
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
47.7 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cerato 1.6L EX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
1.6 Turbo Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Welcome Light
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Active Safety Warning System
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cerato 1.6L EX if you care more about overall equipment; choose 1.6 Turbo Hybrid if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cerato 1.6L EX has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cerato 1.6L EX has a wheelbase of 2700, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2895. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 1.6 Turbo Hybrid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cerato 1.6L EX uses Front Wheel Drive, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid uses No data.