Cerato 1.6L EX vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4640
4650
1800
1905
1440
1630
2700
2775
427
/
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
14.9
15.8
53
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
13.2
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5
122 BHP - 161 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic
7AT & AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
202 BHP
154
305
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cerato 1.6L EX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCerato 1.6L EX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cerato 1.6L EX if you care more about price; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cerato 1.6L EX has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cerato 1.6L EX has a wheelbase of 2700, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cerato 1.6L EX uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.