Cerato 1.6L LX vs Mazda 6 Entry Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
221
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4865
1800
1840
1440
1450
2700
/
427
429
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
53
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
122 BHP - 161 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
190 BHP
154
252
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Cerato 1.6L LX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Cerato 1.6L LX if you care more about price; choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Cerato 1.6L LX has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Cerato 1.6L LX has a wheelbase of 2700, while Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Cerato 1.6L LX uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive.