EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) vs Hino 300 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
N/A, Electric
/
Dimensions
7
3
5009
4,765
1979
1,880
1750
2,200
3099
3,430
572
/
Fuel Economy
/
6.6 km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
E-SHIFT (SBW)
6-speed Manual transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
201 BHP - 380
/
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
6 - 7
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
SINGLE
4.0 L
Electric
Diesel
SINGLE
/
215 BHP
147
350
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Hino 300
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHino 300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about power; choose Hino 300 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.