Kia Sportage GT Line vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1600 L
/
132 BHP - 184 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
7-SPEED DCT & 7-SPEED DCT AUTO TRANSMISSION & Automatic
TBD
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
Electric
/
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kia Sportage GT Line
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kia Sportage GT Line if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kia Sportage GT Line has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kia Sportage GT Line has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kia Sportage GT Line uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.