Kicks S vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
190
4
/
1997 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4365 mm
5016
1800 mm
1995
1620 mm
1865
2655 mm
2920
470 L
1800L
196 mm
190
/
2425
/
19"
/
5.7
/
24
/
25
Fuel Economy
45 L
60
15 Km/L
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Leather
PU
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
All Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
54
/
6.6
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
Double wishbone type
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
Five-link
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
/
AWD
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated
/
Ventilated
/
60 /255 R19
/
60 /255 R19
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5T / PHEV
118 BHP - 142 BHP
480
Automatic & CVT
AT
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5T / PHEV
Petrol
Hybrid
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
/
4
/
142 BHP
480
190 Nm
630
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Sport / Normal / Eco
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kicks S
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
BYD Ti7 Design
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Lane Following Assist
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
- Remote Central Door Locking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kicks S if you care more about price; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kicks S has a fuel consumption of No data, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kicks S has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks S uses Front Wheel Drive , while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.