Kicks S vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
/
4
6
1997 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4365 mm
5035
1800 mm
1989
1620 mm
1778
2655 mm
3008
470 L
/
196 mm
/
Fuel Economy
45 L
/
15 Km/L
/
/
9.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
252 - 337
Automatic & CVT
8-speed Automatic (8AT) & 8AT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
/
4
/
142 BHP
337 BHP
190 Nm
445
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kicks S
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kicks S if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kicks S has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kicks S has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3008. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks S uses Front Wheel Drive , while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.