CarteaCompare Cars Kicks S vs HS5 Basic 2.0T

Kicks S vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

200 km/h

4

4

1997 cc

1998 cc

GCC

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

4 Doors

4365 mm

4760 mm

1800 mm

1907 mm

1620 mm

1700 mm

2655 mm

2870 mm

470 L

453 L

196 mm

130 m

Fuel Economy

45 L

64 L

15 Km/L

7.1 Km/L

/

7.1 Km/L

Comfort

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Electric

Electric

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

Android LCD

/

12.3

/

/

/

12

Transmission

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

118 BHP - 142 BHP

221 BHP - 252 BHP

Automatic & CVT

8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.0 L

2.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

None

Twin Turbo

4

4

142 BHP

221 BHP

190 Nm

340 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Kicks S

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • HS5 Basic 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and trend compliant design
  • High fuel economy for efficiency
  • Effective use of internal space

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited
  • Slow transmission response
  • The quality of interior materials is average

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Kicks S

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Kicks S if you care more about price; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Kicks S has a fuel consumption of No data, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Kicks S has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks S uses Front Wheel Drive , while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.