Kicks S vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

4

/

1997 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

5 Doors

/

4365 mm

4810

1800 mm

1925

1620 mm

1742

2655 mm

2800

470 L

/

196 mm

/

/

19

Fuel Economy

45 L

/

15 Km/L

/

/

13

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

10.25

/

/

10.25"

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Infotainment

/

Android LCD

/

15.6

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

-

118 BHP - 142 BHP

254 - 254

Automatic & CVT

AT & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0L

Petrol

Gasoline

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

2.0T GDI

None

/

4

/

142 BHP

254

190 Nm

390

/

Turbocharge

Technologies

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Kicks S

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and trend compliant design
  • High fuel economy for efficiency
  • Effective use of internal space

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited
  • Slow transmission response
  • The quality of interior materials is average

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Kicks S

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Kicks S if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Nissan | Kicks S

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Kicks S has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Kicks S has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks S uses Front Wheel Drive , while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.