Kicks S vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1997 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4365 mm
4680 mm
1800 mm
1840 mm
1620 mm
1725 mm
2655 mm
2706 mm
470 L
550 L
196 mm
/
Fuel Economy
45 L
60 L
15 Km/L
15.6 Km/L
/
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.5 L
118 BHP
132 BHP - 188 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
None
4
4
142 BHP
188 BHP
190 Nm
244 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kicks S
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kicks S if you care more about overall equipment; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kicks S has a fuel consumption of No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kicks S has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks S uses Front Wheel Drive , while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.