Kicks SL vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
180 km/h
4
6
1997 cc
2698 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4365 mm
4800 mm
1800 mm
1937 mm
1620 mm
1962 mm
2655 mm
2950 mm
470 L
562 L
186 mm
260 m
Fuel Economy
45 L
79 L
15 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
/
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
7
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.3 L - 3.0 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
181 - 418 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
2.7 L
Petrol
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
/
4
4
142 BHP
330 BHP
190 Nm
542 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kicks SL
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kicks SL if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kicks SL has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kicks SL has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks SL uses Front Wheel Drive , while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.