CarteaCompare Cars Kicks SL vs ET BEV

Kicks SL vs ET BEV Comparison

Car Information

/

410km

/

77kwh

/

19.8 kWh/100km

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

4

/

1997 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4365 mm

4980

1800 mm

1975

1620 mm

1694

2655 mm

3000

470 L

/

186 mm

/

/

21"

Fuel Economy

45 L

/

15 Km/L

/

/

19.8 kWh/100km

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

4-direction electric

/

/

NFC

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

front seats

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

23

Battery/Charging

/

10 min/ 20-80%

Transmission

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

/

✓ + CDC

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

TBD

118 BHP - 142 BHP

473HP

Automatic & CVT

AT

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

/

Petrol

Electric

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

None

/

4

/

142 BHP

473HP

190 Nm

660Nm

/

353kw

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

L2 ADAS

/

Front & Rear

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

2

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Kicks SL

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • ET BEV

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Driving Recorder
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and trend compliant design
  • High fuel economy for efficiency
  • Effective use of internal space

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited
  • Slow transmission response
  • The quality of interior materials is average

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Kicks SL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Kicks SL if you care more about price; choose ET BEV if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Kicks SL

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Nissan | Kicks SL

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Nissan | Kicks SL

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Nissan | Kicks SL

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Nissan | Kicks SL

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Kicks SL has a fuel consumption of No data, while ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Kicks SL has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET BEV, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks SL uses Front Wheel Drive , while ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive.