Kicks SL vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1997 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4365 mm
4760 mm
1800 mm
1907 mm
1620 mm
1700 mm
2655 mm
2870 mm
470 L
453 L
186 mm
130 m
Fuel Economy
45 L
64 L
15 Km/L
7.1 Km/L
/
7.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
Twin Turbo
4
4
142 BHP
221 BHP
190 Nm
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kicks SL
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
HS5 Basic 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kicks SL if you care more about price; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kicks SL has a fuel consumption of No data, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kicks SL has a wheelbase of 2655 mm , while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kicks SL uses Front Wheel Drive , while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.