Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
194 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4697 mm
4490 mm
1882 mm
1874 mm
1681 mm
1613 mm
2791 mm
2750 mm
650 L
/
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
/
60 L
/
14.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
180 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
150 BHP
305 BHP
250 Nm
680 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.