Kodiaq Selection vs 11 AWD Comparison

Car Information

9.9

/

Engine / Motor

201

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

4,758

4880 mm

2,133

1970 mm

1,659

1601 mm

2,791

2975 mm

/

5 Doors

/

545 L

Fuel Economy

14,6

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

Passenger Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

9

/

forward collision warning

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10"

10.25

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

Transmission

/

7-speed DSG

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.4L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Turbocharge

/

1.4 TSI

/

150 hp

599 BHP

150/5,000–6,000

/

250

650 Nm

250/1,500–3,500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

TBD

/

570 BHP

/

TBD

/

Electric

/

TBD

/

5 Seater

Motor

/

13.5

/

options.Lithium

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Kodiaq Selection

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • 11 AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick11 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Kodiaq Selection if you care more about overall equipment; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq Selection has a fuel consumption of 0.68, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Kodiaq Selection has a wheelbase of 2,791, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq Selection uses No data, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.