Kodiaq Selection vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
201
200 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4,758
4360 mm
2,133
2032 mm
1,659
1525 mm
2,791
2670 mm
/
380 L
Fuel Economy
14,6
17.9 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
forward collision warning
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
✓
/
7-speed DSG
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.4L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.4 TSI
/
150 hp
155 BHP
150/5,000–6,000
/
250
240 Nm
250/1,500–3,500
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1199 L - 1600 L
/
120 BHP - 155 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq Selection
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Keeping Assist
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq Selection if you care more about fuel economy; choose C4 Feel if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq Selection has a fuel consumption of 0.68, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, Kodiaq Selection is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq Selection has a wheelbase of 2,791, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq Selection, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq Selection uses No data, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.