Kona Electric 2025 vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
167
/
Dimensions
5
5
4205
4660
1800
1875
1555
1670
/
1578
/
19"
/
2720
/
176
Fuel Economy
/
13.3
/
51
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
AT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R17
235/50 R19
215/55 R17
235/50 R19
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
150 BHP - 204
/
AT & Automatic
/
Electric & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
204
195 HP
395
290
/
1.6
Exterior
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kona Electric 2025
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOmoda C7 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kona Electric 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kona Electric 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kona Electric 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kona Electric 2025 uses No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.