L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
182 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
5330 mm
/
1963 mm
/
1897 mm
/
3180 mm
Fuel Economy
/
10.2 Km/L
75L
80 L
/
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6A/T
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.5 L
2.4 L
128 - 150
210 BHP
5M/T & 6A/T & 6M/T & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 - 6 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.4L
2.4 L
Diesel
Gasoline
Diesel (4N16) 2442CC Intercooled Turbocharged
/
150
210 BHP
3500rpm
/
330Nm
320 Nm
1500-3000rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- Child Lock
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T if you care more about price; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T has a fuel consumption of No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T has a wheelbase of No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T uses Front Drive, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.