L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T vs Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
5410 mm
/
1934 mm
/
1886 mm
/
3230 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
75L
80 L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6A/T
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
128 BHP - 148 BHP
188 - 188
Manual
8AT & AT8 & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 6 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.4L
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
Diesel (4N16) 2442CC Intercooled Turbocharged
/
150
188 BHP
3500rpm
/
330Nm
360 Nm
1500-3000rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- Child Lock
Poer 2.0T Top (4WD)
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPoer 2.0T Top (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T if you care more about overall equipment; choose Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T has a fuel consumption of No data, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T has a wheelbase of No data, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3230 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L200 GL D/CAB Diesel 6A/T uses Front Drive, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.