L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison

Car Information

110

/

/

10.6

/

Engine / Motor

169

175

4

5

Dimensions

3 Seater

5 Seater

15

/

5300

5.362

1815

1.976

1780

1.816

3000

3.221

/

1180

Fuel Economy

15.5

11.1

75

80

Comfort

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2351 L

2.0 L - 3198 L

128 BHP - 136 BHP

118 BHP - 392 BHP

Manual

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

3.2 L

Diesel

Diesel

148 BHP

200 BHP

330

470

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL

    • Rear Defogger
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL has a wheelbase of 3000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L200 Single Cab GL 2.4L 2WD 6MT DSL uses Rear Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.