L5 6.0 V12 vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5555 mm
5095 mm
2018 mm
1875 mm
1578 mm
1485 mm
3435 mm
2970 mm
Fuel Economy
5 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
105 L
70 L
5 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.0 L
1.8 L - 3.0 L
402 BHP
138 BHP - 228 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
6.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
402 BHP
204 BHP
550 Nm
260 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
L5 6.0 V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose L5 6.0 V12 if you care more about interior space; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, L5 6.0 V12 has a fuel consumption of 20, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, L5 6.0 V12 has a wheelbase of 3435 mm, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L5 6.0 V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L5 6.0 V12 uses All Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.