L7 Pro vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

5.3

/

42.8

/

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

4

/

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5

20

/

5

/

5050

/

1995

/

1750

/

3005

/

/

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

13.5

/

65

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Electric

/

Interior

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

4.82

11.9

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

OLED

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Nappa Leather

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.7

/

15.7

14.5

/

/

/

/

/

/

19

/

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

1

/

AT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Double wishbone front suspension

/

Five-link rear suspension

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

255/50 R20

/

255/50 R20

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

/

449 BHP

TBD

AT

DHT

Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

/

Hybrid

Electric

449 BHP

/

330

/

620

/

Motor

620

/

2

/

PMSM

/

330

/

449

489

/

Lithium-ion

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comfort, Normal, Sport, Performance

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

L2

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • L7 Pro

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose L7 Pro if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Li Auto | L7 Pro

VS

Porsche | Porsche Macan 2018 3.0L S

Li Auto | L7 Pro

VS

BMW | X1 2025 20i

Li Auto | L7 Pro

VS

Xpeng | G6 AWD Performance

Li Auto | L7 Pro

VS

BMW | BMW X7 2022 xDriveM50i

Li Auto | L7 Pro

VS

BMW | BMW X7 2021 xDriveM50i

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, L7 Pro has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, L7 Pro has a wheelbase of 3005, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L7 Pro uses Four-Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.