Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Aviator 3.0T V6 Base Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
250 km/h
3460 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
5080 mm
1980 mm
2284 mm
1920 mm
1743 mm
2850 mm
3025 mm
1004 L
500 L
235 mm
/
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
110 L
76 L
9.3 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
240 BHP - 409
400 BHP - 400 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
10 Speed Automatic & Automatic & Automatic Speed-10
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
6 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
409 BHP
400 BHP
650 Nm
563 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Aviator 3.0T V6 Base
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about price; choose Aviator 3.0T V6 Base if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Base has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Base has a wheelbase of 3025 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Aviator 3.0T V6 Base, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Base uses All Wheel Drive.