Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
220 km/h
3460 cc
3600 cc
GCC
GCC
/
6
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5115 mm
4914 mm
1980 mm
1968 mm
1920 mm
1798 mm
2850 mm
2964 mm
1004 L
487 L
235 mm
213 m
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
8 Km/L
110 L
87 L
9.3 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
3-Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
9
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
240 BHP - 409
286 BHP - 707 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
8AT & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
V
3.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
4
409 BHP
293 BHP
650 Nm
352 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR if you care more about price; choose Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L has a wheelbase of 2964 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 3.6L uses Front Wheel Drive.