Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR vs Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
250 km/h
3460 cc
1984 cc
GCC
GCC
/
4
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5145 mm
5052 mm
1980 mm
1968 mm
1890 mm
1741 mm
2850 mm
2994 mm
1004 L
740 L
235 mm
210 m
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
8.1 Km/L
110 L
85 L
9.3 Km/L
8.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
4-Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.5
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
12.3
12
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
2.0 L - 6.0 L
240 BHP - 409
252 BHP - 500 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
Halogen
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
409 BHP
252 BHP
650 Nm
370 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR if you care more about price; choose Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2994 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L uses All Wheel Drive.