Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs Hino 300 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
3
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
4,765
1980 mm
1,880
1920 mm
2,200
2890 mm
3,430
1004 L
/
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
6.6 km/L
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
6-speed Manual transmission
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
4.0 L
240 BHP - 409
147
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
6-speed Manual transmission
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
3
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
271 BHP
147
385 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Hino 300
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHino 300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hino 300 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.