Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
170
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5
5115 mm
4323
1980 mm
1809
1920 mm
1653
2890 mm
2585
1004 L
359/1166
221 m
145
/
1318
/
17
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
17.2
110 L
45
9.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
Smart Key
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
Fabric
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
232 BHP - 409
112 BHP - 168
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
271 BHP
118 BHP
385 Nm
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.