Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

180 km/h

6

4

3956 cc

1996 cc

Japanese

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

3 Doors

5 Doors

4235 mm

4914 mm

1840 mm

2207 mm

1910 mm

1842 mm

2310 mm

2900 mm

700 L

259 L

290 m

225 m

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

12 Km/L

90 L

80 L

8 Km/L

12 Km/L

Comfort

Keyless Entry

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Fabric

Digital

Digital

Single

Single

/

Manual

Electric

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

9

10

Android LCD

Android LCD

4

8

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.0 L

2.0 L - 2.3 L

228 BHP

170 BHP - 296 BHP

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

LED with Halogen

LED

/

/

Engine

V

In-Line

4.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Diesel

4

4

228 BHP

170 BHP

360 Nm

405 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) if you care more about price; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Nissan | Nissan Pathfinder 2022 3.5L SV 2WD

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Lexus | Lexus UX 200 2023 Elegant

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.8L VX2 Diesel (4X4)

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Ford | Ford Everest 2024 2.3L XLT AWD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a wheelbase of 2310 mm, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) uses Four Wheel Drive, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.