Land Cruiser GXR1 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4760 mm
1980
1930 mm
1905
1927 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.1
10 Km/L
110
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
2.0 L
240 BHP - 409
223 BHP - 342 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
224 BHP
650
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser GXR1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser GXR1 if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Land Cruiser GXR1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser GXR1 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.