CarteaCompare CarsLand Cruiser GXR1 vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

6

6

/

220 km/h

/

3598 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

18

/

5115

5539 mm

1980

1875 mm

1905

1857 mm

/

4 Doors

/

3487 mm

/

1005 L

/

254 m

Fuel Economy

10.1

11 Km/L

110

83 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Front Doors

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

/

Passenger Door

/

Hi Fabric

Leather

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

Front + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

12

/

6

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

Central And Rear

/

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

/

Chassis & Steering

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R18

/

265/65 R18

/

Key Spec

3.3 L - 5.7 L

3.6 L

240 BHP - 409

285 BHP

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

V

V

3.5

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

409

285 BHP

650

352 Nm

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser GXR1

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
  • Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser GXR1

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser GXR1 if you care more about price; choose Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a wheelbase of No data, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3487 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser GXR1 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L uses All Wheel Drive.