CarteaCompare CarsLand Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT vs ZR-V Apex Edition

Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT vs ZR-V Apex Edition Comparison

Car Information

/

Gasoline

/

本田

/

132.4

/

240

/

4567x1840x1621

/

6.06

/

1.5

Engine / Motor

6

4

Dimensions

5

5

16

18 英寸

4345

4567

1870

1840

1930

1621

2310

2657

/

1488

/

380

/

186

Fuel Economy

8.0

/

90

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

6.7

9

2

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

Automatic

/

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

麦弗逊式独立悬挂

/

多连杆式独立悬挂

Wheels/brakes

Drum

/

265/70R16

225/55 R18

265/70R16

225/55 R18

/

/

/

Key Spec

-

1.5 L - 1.5 L

201 - 228

178 BHP - 180

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission

Automatic & CVT

Diesel & Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.0

1.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

228

180

360

240

/

In-Line

/

Turbocharge

/

1.5L VTEC Turbo

/

/

4

/

132.4

/

6000

/

1700-4500

/

直喷

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
  • ZR-V Apex Edition

    • Power Tailgate
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Comfortable and practical interior design
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced security technologies and systems

Negative

  • Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
  • Pricing may be higher than competitors
  • Modest engine performance compared to some competitors

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT if you care more about price; choose ZR-V Apex Edition if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

VS

Exeed | VX Flagship 2.0T

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T GT

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while ZR-V Apex Edition has a fuel consumption of 6.06. Therefore, ZR-V Apex Edition is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a wheelbase of 2310, while ZR-V Apex Edition has a wheelbase of 2657. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZR-V Apex Edition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while ZR-V Apex Edition uses Front Drive.