Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

6

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

16

/

4330

5209

1800

2010

1955

1731

2310

3110

Fuel Economy

7.8

/

90

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

6.7

/

/

2

/

/

/

Transmission

/

5 Speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

225/95R16C

/

225/95R16C

/

/

Key Spec

-

/

201 - 228

429 BHP - 543 BHP

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.0

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

228

429 BHP

360

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

VS

Volkswagen | Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 05 2023 2.0T Hyper Halo (AWD)

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2025 High

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT

VS

MG | MG HS 2024 1.5T Luxury (PHEV)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT has a fuel consumption of 12.82, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT has a wheelbase of 2310, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 MT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.