CarteaCompare CarsLand Cruiser GR-S HEV vs SQ6 e-tron

Land Cruiser GR-S HEV vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

6

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

/

5115

/

1990

/

1945

/

/

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

10.9

/

68

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

All Doors

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

11.9

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

Passenger Door

/

Driver Seat

/

Premium Leather

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

/

/

Four

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

Front + Knee + Side (1st & 2nd Row) + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

14.5

/

/

/

/

/

14

/

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

Front + Central + Rear

/

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R18

/

265/65 R18

/

Key Spec

3.5

/

457 - 457

TBD

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

DHT

Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

7

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5

/

Hybrid

Electric

457 BHP

/

790

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser GR-S HEV if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2022 S Platinum Edition

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

VS

Porsche | Cayenne E-Hybrid Platinum Edition

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

VS

Genesis | GV70 2.5T Premium

Toyota | Land Cruiser GR-S HEV

VS

Lincoln | Navigator Reserve

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser GR-S HEV has a fuel consumption of 9.17, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser GR-S HEV has a wheelbase of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser GR-S HEV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.