Land Cruiser GR-S HEV vs X5 40i xDrive M Sport Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
/
243 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4922 mm
1990
2004 mm
1945
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
11.4 Km/L
68
83 L
/
11.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Driver Seat
/
Premium Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Four
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Front + Knee + Side (1st & 2nd Row) + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
Transmission
Front + Central + Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Key Spec
3.5
3.0 L - 5.0 L
457 - 457
306 BHP - 530 BHP
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic & CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
340 BHP
790
450 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser GR-S HEV
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
X5 40i xDrive M Sport
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser GR-S HEV if you care more about price; choose X5 40i xDrive M Sport if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser GR-S HEV has a fuel consumption of 9.17, while X5 40i xDrive M Sport has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, X5 40i xDrive M Sport is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser GR-S HEV has a wheelbase of No data, while X5 40i xDrive M Sport has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser GR-S HEV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while X5 40i xDrive M Sport uses All Wheel Drive.