Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT vs Amarok Comfortline 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

200 km/h

/

1998 cc

/

European

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

2285

/

16

/

5405

5350 mm

1870

1910 mm

1945

1886 mm

3180

3268 mm

3300

/

1015

/

/

4 Doors

/

217 m

Fuel Economy

11.7

10.2 Km/L

130

80 L

/

10.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

12

/

/

2

6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

Front & Rear

/

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Drum

/

265/70R16C

/

265/70R16C

/

Key Spec

4.0 L - 4.0 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

201 - 228

168 BHP - 247 BHP

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Manual

10 Speed Automatic & Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline

Diesel

TBD

TBD

2 - 6 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

2.0 L

Diesel

Diesel

201

168 BHP

500

405 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Amarok Comfortline 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAmarok Comfortline 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Amarok Comfortline 2.0T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Crew Cab XLT (Sport Pack) Special Edition

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2023 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

VS

Ford | F 150 XLT 3.5L 2025

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

VS

Ford | F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT has a fuel consumption of 8.55, while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT has a wheelbase of 3180, while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3268 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Amarok Comfortline 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser Pickup S-DLX DSL - DC 4x4 AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.