Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison

Car Information

8.5

/

Engine / Motor

216

260 km/h

4

4

/

2490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

4371

4890 mm

1996

1920 mm

1649

1695 mm

2681

2850 mm

472

350 L

/

5 Seater

/

5 Doors

/

160 m

Fuel Economy

13.5

15 Km/L

67

65 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

14

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

21

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

3.5 L - 3.5 L

200 BHP - 250 BHP

246 BHP - 366 BHP

Automatic

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Gasoline

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

200 BHP

246 BHP

320

315 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • RX 350h Platinum 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Luxury design and high quality
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced technology and amenities

Negative

  • The price is high for some competitors
  • Limited back-end storage space
  • Less sharp control compared to some sports cars

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about price; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

VS

Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2024 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.