LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
180 km/h
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2
5
1230
/
14
/
4045
4400 mm
1665
1830 mm
1930
1590 mm
2650
2630 mm
2000
/
4.9m
/
2075 - 1495 - 1305
/
3.4m³
/
770
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
7.1
43
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
2
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
5-Speed Manual Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Coil Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
165R14C
/
165R14C
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
96 BHP - 96 BHP
156 - 197
4-Speed Automatic & 4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 2 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
96.5
194 BHP
134
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT
- Parking sensor rear
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
C5 TECH 1.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.