LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

6

Dimensions

2

3

1230

2155

14

16

4045

5265

1665

1950

1930

1990

2650

3210

2000

3200

4.9m

5.5m

2075 - 1495 - 1305

2530 - 1760 - 1340

3.4m³

6.2m³

770

1045

Fuel Economy

14.1 Km/L

9.1 Km/L

43

70

Comfort

/

Interior

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

/

4.2

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

Infotainment

7

8

2

2

Transmission

5-Speed Manual Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Drive

Coil Spring

Leaf spring rigid

/

Macpherson Strut

Wheels/brakes

Drum

Drum

165R14C

215/70R16C

165R14C

215/70R16C

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

96 BHP - 96 BHP

88 BHP - 277

4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 2

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

Engine

1.5

3.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

96.5

277

134

351

Technologies

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
  • Hiace Van STD GAS MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose Hiace Van STD GAS MT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Renault | Master L4H3

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Boxer

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Urvan 2024 15-Seater Manual (4-Door)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a wheelbase of 3210. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van STD GAS MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT uses Rear Drive.