LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Partner Comparison

Car Information

/

11.3

/

74

/

200

Engine / Motor

4

/

Dimensions

2

2

1230

/

14

/

4045

4401

1665

1848

1930

1796

2650

2785

2000

/

4.9m

/

2075 - 1495 - 1305

/

3.4m³

/

770

/

/

3.8

Fuel Economy

14.1 Km/L

/

43

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

5-Speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

/

Coil Spring

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

165R14C

/

165R14C

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.6 L - 1.6 L

96 BHP - 96 BHP

100 - 110 BHP

4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 2

2 - 3 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.2

Gasoline

Gasoline

96.5

100

134

200

/

74

/

3750

/

1750

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
  • Partner

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Driving Recorder
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPartner

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Partner if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Renault | Master L4H3

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Boxer

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Urvan 2024 15-Seater Manual (4-Door)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Partner has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Partner has a wheelbase of 2785. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Partner, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while Partner uses No data.